Find the latest posts below. See the Songs page for a complete list of all songs discussed on these pages. See the About page for an introduction to the site.
I’ve been wondering lately why I’ve never written an appreciation for any of Warren Zevon’s songs. It’s certainly not that he didn’t give us many great tracks to choose from. Upon reflection, perhaps it’s because he wrote so many compact little gems that it’s hard to pick just one.
Whatever the reason, this song of his has been haunting me lately, so it’s time to correct the omission.
Part of Zevon’s genius as a lyricist was his ability to invest ordinary material objects with such deep feelings.
This song is an outstanding example. It’s so simple, so short, and yet the words and images resonate like stones skipped onto the water, with meaning spreading out in expanding ripples.
I’m going to share the lyrics in their entirety before commenting — and, of course, I encourage you to listen to Zevon’s recording as well.
I was sitting in the Hollywood Hawaiian Hotel;
I was staring in my empty coffee cup.
I’ve been a Jesse Winchester fan ever since I slipped his first album onto my turntable in my dorm room back in Ann Arbor, but somehow I don’t think I’d paid much attention to this gem until I stumbled across it yesterday.
This fits neatly into Winchester’s small but accomplished set of songs about god and religion — songs like “Quiet About It” and “Isn’t That So?”.
One of the things I love about this group of Winchester songs is that he displays obvious familiarity with, and even sympathy for, the Christian tradition, but manages to bring an entirely fresh approach to his questioning of these sacred topics.
This song seems to start with the picture painted by the spiritual “When The Saints Go Marching In,” and then picks up from there.
Give a listen to the Winchester recording, then stroll with me through the lyrics.
This is a gem of a Dylan song: not a big, gaudy rock, but a modest yet finely wrought masterpiece.
It was released in 1989 on his album Oh Mercy, so it’s not from any of his early years, during which his work was more consistently revered. The album was produced by Daniel Lanois, and critics are somewhat divided over the success of his efforts in rendering Dylan’s voice and compositions.
I find the original version by Dylan to be pretty underwhelming, but the song came alive for me when I heard it performed by Sarah Jarosz. She recorded it on her second album, Follow Me Down, from 2011, and she’s included it consistently in the several live shows of hers that I’ve seen.
For me the Dylan version seems a bit slow and somnolent, while the Jarosz version feels much more spirited. Partly, I suppose, it’s the difference between the performance of a world-weary man approaching the half-century mark, working on his 26th album, versus a youthful 20-year old working on her second.
I’ve already written about “Long Black Veil,” which was one one of my father’s favorite songs.
So I’m probably overdue to write about “Pancho and Lefty,” which was one of my father-in-law’s favorites – and one of mine as well.
A bit like “Hallelujah,” by Leonard Cohen, this song seems to have had an interesting life of its own.
It was written by Townes Van Zandt, a legendary Texan singer/songwriter, and first released on his album The Late Great Townes Van Zandt back in 1972.
Neither the song nor the album received a whole lot of attention at the time, let alone any accolades.
Then Emmylou Harris recorded it on her album Luxury Liner in 1977, giving the song a bit more exposure.
And then, finally, Willie Nelson and Merle Haggard recorded it in 1983, and released it as a single, which promptly became a huge hit for the pair. As the story goes, Willie Nelson’s daughter introduced the song to them.
I first heard this song as part of the soundtrack to a movie with the same name, made by Peter Bogdanovich in 1981. The movie is worth watching, if you like quirky (as I generally do), but it was the song that stuck with me.
This was really my introduction to the songs of George and Ira Gershwin, with George supplying the music, and brother Ira providing the lyrics.
Many of their songs have become recognized as part of the Great American Songbook, but Ira’s lyrics are often too subtle and offbeat to fit cleanly into that mold.
This song, in particular, is one that is less frequently sung. Supposedly playwright and producer George S. Kaufman heard an early rehearsal of the number and wondered whether it was, in fact, a love song at all, before the brothers finally got to the lyric “They laughed at me wanting you,” at which point Kaufman threw up his hands and said, “Oh, well.
I’ve been reading Rick Rubin’s book The Creative Act: A Way of Being lately – not all at once, mind you, but sipping it slowly, like a rare old whiskey – and it’s put me in mind of this song by Bob Dylan, from 1971.
This composition has been performed and recorded by Dylan himself on multiple occasions, but the first released recording was by The Band, and their original studio recording is still the version I’m partial to.
Let’s just review the lyrics, shall we? Ideally, of course, along with the music.
Oh, the streets of Rome are filled with rubble.
Ancient footprints are everywhere.
Southerner Thomas Wolfe, in his book You Can’t Go Home Again, had his main character speak these words:
You can’t go back home to your family, back home to your childhood … back home to a young man’s dreams of glory and of fame … back home to places in the country, back home to the old forms and systems of things which once seemed everlasting, but which are changing all the time – back home to the escapes of Time and Memory.
John Hiatt seemed to have had much the same sentiments in mind when he penned his song “Train to Birmingham.”
Several others have recorded this composition, but Hiatt’s own version seems to me to be the definitive rendition.
As the eighth track from the album Dirty Jeans and Mudslide Hymns starts up, note how the rhythm of the drums gives you a seat on the train before Hiatt even opens his mouth.
I’ve been thinking a lot lately about this song by Robert Earl Keen, first recorded by Joe Ely for his Love and Danger album, released in 1992.
It is – be advised – a difficult song, in that the narrator talks about shooting and killing people, and tries to justify his actions.
So before I start sharing my thoughts, perhaps it is best to issue a clarification that no one here is advocating for any kind of gun violence. Heck, I don’t even own a gun.
But it is a great song.
I consider both Joe Ely’s version and the later recording by the songwriter himself to be excellent renditions, so feel free to listen to either, or both.
And now, let’s dive into the words.
I crossed the desert in a dining car,
In the spring of ninety-one.
I met some people drinking at the bar,
They were laughing, having fun.
I told 'em that I hadn’t heard the joke
That was so hilarious.
This is a traditional Appalachian folk song believed to have originated in eastern Kentucky around the beginning of the 20th century.
The melody seems to have come from the ballad “Matty Groves,” and probably started out in England or Scotland.
If you’re a child of the sixties like me, then your introduction to the song may have come though the electrified adaptation by Quicksilver Messenger Service, but it is more typically performed in acoustic folk, country or bluegrass styles.
One of the features that draws me to this song is its elusive, shape-shifting nature. As in a dream, very specific, concrete images appear and then are replaced with others, leaving the singer/listener/dreamer free to choose the meanings they associate with these word pictures.
This elusive quality begins with the title itself, which sounds like the name or description of a place, and yet is often used in the song as if it were the name of a woman.
I’ve spent some time lately working my way through The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity, by Davids Graeber and Wengrow. It’s a fascinating book, and a really rewarding read, but it’s also a serious tome, clocking in at over 500 pages of text dense with facts and ideas, so it’s not something I’ve been attempting all at one go.
Anyway, as I was reading the latest chapter last night I came across this surprising observation:
There is an obvious objection to evolutionary models which assume that our strongest social ties are based on close biological kinship: many humans just don’t like their families very much. And this appears to be just as true of present-day hunter-gatherers as anybody else. Many seem to find the prospect of living their entire lives surrounded by close relatives so unpleasant that they will travel very long distances just to get away from them.
For a complete list of all songs discussed on the site, see the Songs Table.
↑ Back to top